symbolic.Rd
Returns a character string representing k-tensor and
k-form objects in symbolic form. Used by the print method if
either option kform_symbolic_print
or
ktensor_symbolic_print
is non-null.
as.symbolic(M,symbols=letters,d="")
Spivak (p89), in archetypically terse writing, states:
A function f is considered to be a 0-form and f⋅ω is also written f∧ω. If f:Rn⟶R is differentiable, then Df(p)∈Λ1(Rn). By a minor modification we therefore obtain a 1-form df, defined by df(p)(vp)=Df(p)(v).
Let us consider in particular the 1-forms dπi. It is customary to let xi denote the function πi (On R3 we often denote x1, x2, and x3 by x, y, and z). This standard notation has obvious disadvantages but it allows many classical results to be expressed by formulas of equally classical appearance. Since dxi(p)(vp)=dπi(p)(vp)=Dπi(p)(v)=vi, we see that dx1(p),…,dxn(p) is just the dual basis to (e1)p,…,(en)p. Thus every k-form ω can be written
ω=∑i1<⋯<ikωi1,…,ikdxi1∧⋯∧dxik.
Function as.symbolic()
uses this format. For completeness, we
add (p77) that k-tensors may be expressed in the form
n∑i1,…,ik=1ai1,…,ik⋅ϕi1⊗⋯⊗ϕik.
and this form is used for k-tensors. The print method for
tensors, print.ktensor()
, writes d1
for ϕ1,
d2
for ϕ2 [where ϕi(xj)=δji].
Returns a “noquote” character string.
(o <- kform_general(3,2,1:3))
#> An alternating linear map from V^2 to R with V=R^3:
#> val
#> 2 3 = 3
#> 1 3 = 2
#> 1 2 = 1
as.symbolic(o,d="d",symbols=letters[23:26])
#> [1] +3 dx^dy +2 dw^dy + dw^dx
(a <- rform(n=50))
#> An alternating linear map from V^3 to R with V=R^50:
#> val
#> 4 14 22 = -6
#> 3 36 40 = -4
#> 1 20 44 = -5
#> 5 23 49 = 9
#> 25 28 34 = 3
#> 3 20 38 = 8
#> 28 38 50 = -2
#> 6 11 22 = 7
#> 9 16 28 = -1
as.symbolic(a,symbols=state.abb)
#> [1] -6 AR^IN^MI -4 AZ^OK^SC -5 AL^MD^UT +9 CA^MN^WI +3 MO^NV^ND +8 AZ^MD^PA -2 NV^PA^WY +7 CO^HI^MI - FL^KS^NV